Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Owczarzak v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 5:2023cv13113
Plaintiff:
Gerard Owczarzak
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Appearances International et al
as 2:2023cv12678
Plaintiff:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK USA, N.A and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Defendant:
Appearances International and E2E, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lechler et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 2:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lechler and Michael A. Lechler
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harris v. American Electric Poer Service Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Lorraine R Harris
Defendant:
American Electric Poer Service Corporation, Empower Retirement LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Alexander v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 4:2022cv12030
Plaintiff:
Linn Alexander
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
AMEN-RA v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 4:2021cv12890
Plaintiff:
MARWAN AMEN-RA
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and Talin Timas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fails v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2021cv05228
Plaintiff:
John D Fails, Jr
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
