Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sanders v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv03315
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Sanders
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, McCalla Raymer LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Stone et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02685
Plaintiff:
Christine Stone, David Kevin Shanyfelt, Jeanette P. Bowen and others
Defendant:
Popular Inc., Popular ABS, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon and others
Jackson v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Valerie Jackson
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Dora Pinder , Probate Court for Franklin County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Nexus Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03537
Plaintiff:
Vence A. Williams
Defendant:
Nexus Financial Group, Inc., Brian L. Peart, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. The United States et al
as 1:2009mi00277
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Dean
Defendant:
The United States, The State of Georgia, Douglas County, Georgia and others
Movant:
C T Corporation System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
Type:
Civil Rights
Dean v. Durham et al
as 1:2008cv02769
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Dean
Defendant:
J. Bryant Durham, Floyd County Sheriff's Office, Therbert Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
