Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eddie Garey, Jr. v. Michael Thompson, et al
as 10-13537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE MILTON GAREY, JR., a.k.a. Negro Garey
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL G. THOMPSON, F.B.I., DAN ROLINCE, F.B.I., DARON CHENEY, F.B.I. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ACRE v. CHENEY BROTHERS INC
as 4:2009cv00140
Plaintiff:
OSCAR ACRE
Defendant:
CHENEY BROTHERS INC and CHENEY BROTHERS INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green v. Bush et al
as 3:2007cv00998
Plaintiff:
Clinton Green, Sr.
Defendant:
George W. Bush, William J. Clinton, George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herbert v. United States of America et al
as 3:2007cv00964
Plaintiff:
Susan Herbert
Defendant:
United States of America, George Bush, Jr., John Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garey v. Thompson et al
as 5:2007cv00322
Plaintiff:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael G. Thompson, Dan Rolince, Daron Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herbert v. USA et al
as 3:2007cv00699
Plaintiff:
Susan Herbert
Defendant:
USA, George Bush, Jr., Richard Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Herbert v. USA et al
as 3:2007cv00315
Plaintiff:
Susan Herbert
Defendant:
USA, George Bush, Richard Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Susan et al v. United States et al
as 3:2007cv00267
Plaintiff:
Susan, Ethan and Christopher
Defendant:
United States, George Bush, Rick G. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
