Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Aguilar et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Keli Aguilar, Gina Armendariz, Mariah Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
CHENOWETH v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2020cv08163
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC, NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC and others
Plaintiff:
BOB CHENOWETH
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHENOWETH v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv02206
Defendant:
NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHENOWETH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHENOWETH et al v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2014cv02017
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHENOWETH and ANTOINETTE CHENOWETH
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
CHENOWETH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42324
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR F. CHENOWETH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CHENOWETH v. AMERICAN STANDARD INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67228
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A. CHENOWETH
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD INC., AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHENOWETH v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv07593
Plaintiff:
WILBERT CHENOWETH
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
