Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Crayton v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Tony Parker, Eric Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Robinson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Cherry Lindamood, (f/n/u) Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. Stults et al
as 1:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Crockett
Defendant:
Zebulton Stults, Corey D. Cattrell, Leigh Staggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinchon v. Lindamood
as 3:2016cv03031
Petitioner:
Edward Pinchon
Respondent:
Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Brantley et al
as 1:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Robinson
Defendant:
Sean Brantley, Kelly Garska, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, (f/n/u) Franks, Joe Doe Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bonds
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Corporations Corrections of America, Derrick Scofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Van Smith
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, f/n/u Franks, Centennial Med. Ctr. Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonds v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bonds
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Corporations Corrections of America, Derrick Scofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lindamood
as 3:2016cv02631
Petitioner:
Cedric Jones
Respondent:
Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
