Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Michael Blanco v. Gregory Duncan, et al
as 17-55968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BLANCO
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY J. DUNCAN, Primary Care Physician, BARBARA FELLOWS, Registered Nurse, CHERYL MALO-CLINES, Primary Care Physician and others
Michael Blanco v. Gregory Duncan, et al
as 16-56687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BLANCO
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY J. DUNCAN, Primary Care Physician, BARBARA FELLOWS, Registered Nurse, CHERYL MALO-CLINES, Primary Care Physician and others
Blanco v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Blanco
Defendant:
Gregory J. Duncan, MD, Barbara Fellows, RN, Cheryl Malo-Clines, FNP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaime Estrada v. Michael Sayre, et al
as 14-16591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIME IGNACIO ESTRADA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL SAYRE, CMO and CHERYL MALO-CLINES
Jaime Estrada v. Michael Sayre, et al
as 14-80004
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JAIME IGNACIO ESTRADA
Defendant - Respondent:
MICHAEL SAYRE, CMO and CHERYL MALO-CLINES
Treadway v. Malo-Clines et al
as 3:2012cv04039
Plaintiff:
John L. Treadway
Defendant:
Cheryl Malo-Clines, Edgar Clark, J. Boadoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rochester v. Linda Rowe, et al
as 10-17772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAWN ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA ROWE, MD, CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Dr., MICHAEL C. SAYRE and others
King v. Sayre et al
as 2:2010cv03216
Plaintiff:
Mailliard L. King
Defendant:
M. C. Sayre, Cheryl Malo-Clines and A.C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Sayre et al
as 3:2010cv03137
Plaintiff:
Mailliard L. King
Defendant:
M. C. Sayre, Cheryl Malo-Clines and A. C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uvalles v. Jaquez et al
as 5:2009cv05221
Plaintiff:
Raul Uvalles
Defendant:
Francisco Jaquez, R. K. Bell, J. Diggle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
