Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Bodhi v. Strange et al
as 4:2024cv05039
Plaintiff:
Bodhi
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Lisa Flynn, Dawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wise et al
as 4:2023cv05143
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill and Robert J Hill
Defendant:
Todd Wise, Jon Coers, Aaron Kershaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Katrinssonr et al v. Strange et al
as 4:2023cv05139
Plaintiff:
Skeggi Hildolf Katrinssonr and Bodhi
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Lisa Flynn, Dawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2023cv05113
Plaintiff:
Robert J Hill
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair, Tyler Tompkins, Billie Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
John Valda Rice
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Melissa Andrewjeski, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dreyer v. Collins et al
as 1:2023cv03034
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Dreyer
Defendant:
Tim Collins, Sr, Cheryl Strange and Sabrina Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thibodeaux v. Daniel et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Louis James Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Paul H Daniel, James Key, A Ureno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroman v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05159
Plaintiff:
Elijah M Stroman
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange and Donald Holbrok
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Strange
as 2:2022cv00226
Petitioner:
John Griffin Headrick
Respondent:
Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
