Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartley
Defendant:
Cheyenne Tubbs, Scott Burgess, Ian Druce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Peek et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Mark Richardson
Defendant:
Jim Peek, Timothy Vann and Cheyenne Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Patrick Delane Williams
Defendant:
Jordan Blake Jones, Jace Gilly, Marcus Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. Baird et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Stephens County, Dexter Lawley, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopes-Bey v. Atoka County Sheriff et al
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Hopes-Bey
Defendant:
Atoka County Sheriff, Tim Webster, Cheyenne Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oranchak v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Emma Cheyenne Sky Oranchak
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alexander v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2022cv00497
Petitioner:
Chelcie Alexander and Chelcie Cheyenne Keigh Alexander
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bogue et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv00656
Plaintiff:
Jenna Zingerman and Daniel David Bogue
Defendant:
John Doe and Tyler Cheyenne Cody Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
