Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PIERCE v. EDWARDS et al
as 7:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
ANTRAVENO JAROD PIERCE
Defendant:
Chief Judge JOHN KENT EDWARDS, JR, Judge ELLEN GOLDEN, KIMBERLY FUKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNTON v. WALL
as 5:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE SARAH F WALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN SUE MICKENS, WARDEN MOESHA MCMILLIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. PARKER et al
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
ARTHUR PARKER, LLL CORPORATION, DELBRA PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUMPH v. SUPERIOR COURT OF HOUSTON JUDICIAL CIRCUIT et al
as 5:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
RYAN CORNELUS RUMPH
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF HOUSTON JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, DAN BIBLER and CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD D LUKEMIRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LITTLEJOHN v. MIERS et al
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LITTLEJON and TIMOTHY LITTLEJOHN
Defendant:
CLERK MIERS, CHEIF JUDGE STREETMAN and CHIEF JUDGE STREETMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAY v. BUSH et al
as 5:2020cv00365
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK, JOHN DOE, SHERIFF CULLEN TALTON and others
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. GILLIS et al
as 5:2020cv00092
Plaintiff:
JIMELL RAHEEN BROWN
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE DONALD W GILLIS, TREUTLEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DUBLIN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, JUDGE JON F HELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURTIS v. MASSEE et al
as 5:2019cv00452
Defendant:
CHAIRPERSON EMILY DAVIS, SHERIFF WILLIAM MASSEE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERRY N MASSEY and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL CURTIS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
