Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Han-Noggle, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 15-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE HAN-NOGGLE, as daughter and next of kin to Mary Y.C. Han, deceased and ELIZABETH WALLBRO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary Y.C. Han,
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, DARREN WHITE, in his individual and official capacity as Public Safety Director for the City of Albuquerque, ROBERT PERRY, in his individual capacity and official capacity as the City Attorney and others
Han-Noggle, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 15-2051
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KATHERINE HAN-NOGGLE, as daughter and next of kin to Mary Y.C. Han, deceased and ELIZABETH WALLBRO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary Y.C. Han,
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, ROBERT PERRY, in his individual capacity and official capacity as the City Attorney, RAYMOND SCHULTZ, Chief, in his individual and official capacity as the Chief of Police of the Albuquerque Police Department for municipal and supervisory claims and others
Jensen v. Gale, et al
as 15-4006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRETT JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GALE, a Logan City Police Officer, in his individual and official capacities, GARY JENSEN, Logan City Chief of Police, in his individual and official capacities, LOGAN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Hoang v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3233
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRUNG HOANG
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities and others
Mills v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLS
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities and others
Pittman v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JASON PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, KEVIN STEELE, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department and others
Defendant:
TERRY ZIEGLER, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, TERENCE HALL, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department and others
Gardner v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFERY GARDNER
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities and others
Hammons v. Unified Govt of Wyandotte, et al
as 14-3228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT A. HAMMONS
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, VINCE DAVENPORT, in his official and individual capacities and others
Gambrill v. Unified Govt of Wyandotte, et al
as 14-3229
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK GAMBRILL
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
