Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Webb v. Scott, et al
as 15-4053
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellant:
TERRY L. THOMPSON, Sheriff for Weber County, ROBERT WEST, Sgt. at Weber County Correctional Facility, ALTON JOHNSON, Sgt. at Weber County Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT, Police Officer for Ogden City Police Department, FNU MURRAY, KEVIN MCCLEOD, Undersheriff for Weber County Sheriff's Office and others
Webb v. Scott, et al
as 15-602
Petitioner:
DAVID WEBB
Respondent:
TIMOTHY SCOTT, Police Officer for Ogden City Police Department, FNU MURRAY, TERRY L. THOMPSON, Sheriff for Weber County and others
Han-Noggle, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 15-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE HAN-NOGGLE, as daughter and next of kin to Mary Y.C. Han, deceased and ELIZABETH WALLBRO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary Y.C. Han,
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, DARREN WHITE, in his individual and official capacity as Public Safety Director for the City of Albuquerque, ROBERT PERRY, in his individual capacity and official capacity as the City Attorney and others
Han-Noggle, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 15-2051
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KATHERINE HAN-NOGGLE, as daughter and next of kin to Mary Y.C. Han, deceased and ELIZABETH WALLBRO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary Y.C. Han,
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, ROBERT PERRY, in his individual capacity and official capacity as the City Attorney, RAYMOND SCHULTZ, Chief, in his individual and official capacity as the Chief of Police of the Albuquerque Police Department for municipal and supervisory claims and others
Jensen v. Gale, et al
as 15-4006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRETT JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GALE, a Logan City Police Officer, in his individual and official capacities, GARY JENSEN, Logan City Chief of Police, in his individual and official capacities, LOGAN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Thomas v. Rock Springs Young at Heart et al
as 2:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Patricia K Thomas
Defendant:
Rock Springs Young at Heart and Rock Springs Police Department Chief of Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Hoang v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3233
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRUNG HOANG
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities and others
Mills v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLS
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities and others
Pittman v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JASON PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, KEVIN STEELE, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department and others
Defendant:
TERRY ZIEGLER, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, TERENCE HALL, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, c/o Kansas City, Kansas Police Department and others
Gardner v. Unified Govt of Wyandott, et al
as 14-3234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFERY GARDNER
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, RICK ARMSTRONG, Chief of Police in his official and individual capacities, JAMES BROWN, Assistant Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
