Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al v. Chan et al
as 1:2016cv06027
Plaintiff:
Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Defendant:
Jacky Chan, Dragon Telecommunication Company, Lambda Pacific Tech, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Mou et al v. Barraja Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07567
Plaintiff:
Ching Lam Mou and Zenon Xochmitl
Defendant:
Barraja Inc. , Avi Camchi , Helan Kehati and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
HE et al v. LAM et al
as 2:2011cv02790
Plaintiff:
XIAO HUA HE , DE QING ZHENG and SARKURA JAPAN INC.
Defendant:
CHING LAM, FLY DRAGON LTD., CHING CHIOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sin v. Mukasey
as 07-3629
Petitioner:
KAI HUNG SIN, FUNG CHING LAM, CHEUK CHUN SIN and others
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Dai Hing, 68, Inc. et al v. Golden Wok Ohio, LLC et al
as 6:2007cv00318
Plaintiff:
Ching Lam
Defendant:
Golden Wok Ohio, LLC, Golden Wok Ohio, LLC, Golden Wok Ohio, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Golden Wok Ohio, LLC, Sizzling Wok, Marge Slater and others
Counter Defendant:
Ren Xi Lin, Zhao Wang and Jiang Xiam Wei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dai Hing, 68, Inc. et al v. Golden Wok Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00318
Plaintiff:
Dai Hing, 68, Inc. and Ching Lam
Defendant:
Golden Wok Ohio, LLC, Golden Wok Ohio, LLC, Golden Wok Ohio, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
