Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mark Clayton v. Chip Forrester, et al
as 14-6525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK CLAYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIP FORRESTER and THE TENNESSEE DEMOCRATIC STATE PRIMARY BOARD, et al.
Clayton v. Forrester et al
as 3:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Chip Forrester, Brandon Puttbrese, Sean Braisted and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Liberty Legal Foundation, et al v. National Democratic Party of t, et al
as 12-6634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION, JOHN DUMMETT, LEONARD VOLODARSKY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE USA, INC., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, TENNESSEE DEMOCRATIC PARTY and others
Liberty Legal Foundation, et al v. National Democratic Party, et al
as 12-6082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION, JOHN DUMMETT, LEONARD VOLODARSKY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE USA, INC., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, TENNESSEE DEMOCRATIC PARTY and others
Crim v. Tennessee Democratic Party (TNDP) et al
as 3:2012cv00838
Plaintiff:
Larry Crim
Defendant:
Tennessee Democratic Party (TNDP) , Chip Forrester , Executive Committee of the Tennessee Democratic Party and others
Intervenor:
Mark E. Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liberty Legal Foundation et al v. National Democratic Party of the USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02143
Plaintiff:
Liberty Legal Foundation , John Dummett , Leonard Volodarsky and others
Defendant:
National Democratic Party of the USA, Inc., Democratic National Committee , Tennessee Democratic Party and others
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kurita v. State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The et al
as 3:2008cv00948
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita and others
Defendant:
State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The, Paula Combs, Larry Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
