Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stafford v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04092
Plaintiff:
Charles Stafford
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04079
Plaintiff:
Braeden West
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Armstrong
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luna v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04083
Plaintiff:
Antonio Luna
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luna v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04098
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Luna
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04085
Plaintiff:
James McElroy
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04094
Plaintiff:
Justin Morrow
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emfinger v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
David Emfinger
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunn v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bunn
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.