Cases 1 - 10 of 596
Johnson v. Oklahoma County Jail
as 5:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sadowski v. Lindly's Incorporated
as 4:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
Lindly's Incorporated doing business as Lindly's Propane
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. London et al
as 5:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dusty London and Christopher Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Brodeur v. US Government
as 5:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Weeley v. USA
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Christopher Leo Weeley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bowlds v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Charles R Bowlds
Defendant:
Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Tim Laughlin, Cindy Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
