Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sidney Michael Lee et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01749
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Michael Lee, Marshall Earl Harris, Demetrius Lenard Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Frank Douglas Hall et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01745
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Douglas Hall, Christopher Alphonse Jones, Dennis Edward Holladay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , Rose Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , SC Dept Probation Parole and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. South Carolina General Assembly et al
as 6:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina General Assembly, Mark Sanford, SC Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. South Carolina General Assembly et al
as 7:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina General Assembly, Mark Sanford, SC Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
