Cases 41 - 50 of 248
Wells v. Shepard et al
as 3:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Barry Wells
Defendant:
Mark Shepard, Steve Rushing, Pike County Justice Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cardale Neilus Smith
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spicer v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Fred Sanford Spicer, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willis v. Evans et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Derrick Willis
Defendant:
Charles Doug Evans, Clyde Hill, Clarence E. Morgan, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Bryant et al
as 3:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Edgar Patton
Defendant:
Phillip "Phil" Bryant, Randal Thomas, Michael "Mike" Howie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Rashad Terrell Jones
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
James C. Newell, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher B Epps, Ron King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00263
Plaintiff:
Cardale Neilus Smith
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and David Petrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00117
Petitioner:
Cardale Neilus Smith
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps , Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and MDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jermaine A. James
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, E. L. Sparkman and D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
