Cases 51 - 60 of 248
Tran v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00077
Petitioner:
Dung T. Tran
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferlando Esco v. Christopher B. Epps
as 3:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ferlando Esco
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tugle v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00012
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Petitioner:
Dewayne LaDale Tugle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tugle v. Epps et al
as 5:2013cv00009
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Plaintiff:
Dewayne LaDale Tugle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Epps, et al
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
John B. Herring
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Michelle Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv00893
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
McQua Jones and Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weatherspoon v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
David Weatherspoon
Defendant:
E. L. Sparkman, M.D.O.C., Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00988
Plaintiff:
Cecil Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pruitt v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Cecil Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 3:2013cv00980
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Wimdal , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
