Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James Biggins v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 19-2234
Defendant:
STANLEY BAYNARD, MATTHEW DUTTON, CHRISTOPHER CESSNA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CO CONNORS, SGT. FREDDRICKS, LT. WALLACE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv01574
Defendant:
Tim Martin, Sergeant Jones, Ken Simpler and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir, Malachai DeBruce, Antonio R. Bailey and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Dana Metzger, Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Dickens v. Deputy Warden Klein, et al
as 17-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMM. CARL C. DANBERG, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THOMAS CARROLL, BUREAU CHIEF RICK KEARNEY and others
James Biggins v. Robert Burns, et al
as 14-4582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
ROBERT M. BURNS, BERRY BURNMAN, JOHN BURTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA, RONALD L. WILEY, JAMES SCARBOROUGH and others
Biggins v. Burns et al
as 1:2014cv00995
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Robert M. Burns, Berry Burnman, John Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
Biggins v. Zeobouty et al
as 1:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Zeobouty, Gordon, Chelsia Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
