Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Davis v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06342
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Colon Blind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abraham et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04686
Plaintiff:
Leela Abraham, Jeffrey Acker, Judette Adams and others
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Countywide Financial Corporation a Delaware corporation doing business as BAC Home Loans Servicing, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01717
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00187
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09410
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kabba v. Shanahan et al
as 1:2016cv07580
Petitioner:
Mahammed Kabba
Respondent:
Christopher Shanahan , Diane McConnell , Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singleton v. American Transportation Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc02125
Defendant:
American Transportation Holdings, Inc., Christopher Davies and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Claire Singleton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03930
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marte v. Shanahan
as 1:2015cv07448
Respondent:
Christopher Shanahan and Christopher Davies
Petitioner:
Socrates Marte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
