Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Davis-Murry v. Contra Costa Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv04349
Plaintiff:
Blake Christopher Davis-Murry
Defendant:
Contra Costa Health Services, Contra Costa Sheriffs Department, Brian Holoyda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv08381
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis and YURIKO DAVIS
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jermond Christopher Davis v. People of the State of California
as 2:2018cv07553
Petitioner:
Jermond Christopher Davis
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Davis Sr. v. David Baughman
as 5:2018cv00737
Respondent:
David Baughman
Petitioner:
Christopher Davis, Sr.
Adamczyk et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv01846
Plaintiff:
Selene Adamczyk , Troy Adamczyk , Candace Adams and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer HealthCare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matt Jackson et al v. City of West Covina et al
as 2:2016cv08963
Plaintiff:
Peter Aguilar, Marco A. Arredondo, Adam Berger and others
Defendant:
City of West Covina and Does
Jermond Christopher Davis v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2016cv07974
Petitioner:
Jermond Christopher Davis
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Jermond Christopher Davis v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2016cv06861
Petitioner:
Jermond Christopher Davis
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Robin Norde Davis et al v. Sally Beauty Holdings Inc et al
as 8:2015cv01030
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis and Robin Norde Davis
Defendant:
Does, Sally Beauty Holdings Inc and Sally Beauty Supply LLC
Davis v. Felker et al
as 2:2007cv01751
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Felker, Cochran and Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
