Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 101 - 110 of 668
Daughtery v. Epps et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00557
Plaintiff: Troy Michael Daughtery
Defendant: Christopher Epps , Ron Woodall and Unknown Gillis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daughtery v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00215
Plaintiff: Troy Michael Daughtery
Defendant: Christopher Epps, Ron Woodall, S.M.C.I. Dentist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00171
Petitioner: Antonio Neal
Respondent: Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Palmer v. Sims et al
as 2:2013cv00205
Plaintiff: Dennis Ray Palmer
Defendant: Brenda Sims, Ron King and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Lee et al
as 4:2013cv00166
Plaintiff: Jeremy Jefferson
Defendant: Earnest Lee and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Davis et al
as 3:2013cv00584
Plaintiff: Willie James Allen
Defendant: Doug Davis, Christopher Epps, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Epps et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00539
Plaintiff: Alvin Da'Von Thompson
Defendant: Christopher Epps, Lawrence Mack, D. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crook v. Epps et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00551
Plaintiff: Wilbert Crook
Defendant: Christopher Epps and Hubert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crook v. Epps et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff: Wilbert Crook
Defendant: Christopher Epps and Hubert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kemp v. Epps et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00153
Plaintiff: Anthony Kemp
Defendant: Christopher Epps, Faye Noel, M. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?