Cases 111 - 120 of 668
Wansley v. State of Mississipip
as 3:2013cv00517
Plaintiff:
Thomas Calvin Wansley
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winding v. Jones et al
as 3:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Simone Jones , R. Davis , Catherine Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2013cv00147
Petitioner:
Terence One Boyd
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stapleton v. Noel et al
as 4:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Boss Stapleton
Defendant:
Faye Noel, Richard Steward, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris, Sr. v. Little et al
as 4:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. Morris, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Little, Unknown Bucher, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caison v. Epps et al
as 5:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Caison
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Raymond Byrd, James Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Mississippi
as 5:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Cora Ann Turner
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winding v. Ovalle et al
as 4:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
F. Ovalle, F. Rice, MTC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Houston et al
as 3:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Tonya Houston , Christopher Wansley, R. Pepper Crutcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
