Cases 51 - 60 of 173
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dennis O'Neal Lee
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc., Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Walker et al
as 2:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Wall
Defendant:
David Walker and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Morris et al
as 4:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Devin A. Bennett
Defendant:
Norris Morris, Timothy Morris, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Bennie Ward
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lorenzo Cabe, Lisa Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Sparkman et al
as 1:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jairie T. Pierce, Jr.
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollie Evans v. Emmitt Sparkman, et al
as 12-60809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
EMMITT SPARKMAN, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and TIMOTHY MORRIS
Warren Friday v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 12-60793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN D. FRIDAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, EMMITT SPARKMAN, JESSE STREETER and others
Archie Johnson v. James Brewer, et al
as 12-60765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE L. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BREWER, Warden and CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner
Johnson v. Epps et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Lisa Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
