Cases 1 - 8 of 8
KNIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10476
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KNIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96403
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2018cv01191
Petitioner:
Christopher Knight
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knight v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv00968
Petitioner:
Christopher Knight
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Successful Adventures, Inc. v. Fidelis Capital Investments Florida, LP et al
as 8:2014cv02604
Plaintiff:
Successful Adventures, Inc.
Defendant:
Fidelis Capital Investments Florida, LP, Fidelis Trading International Trust, Fidelis Capital Investments, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Knight v. Asphalt Restoration Technology Systems, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00499
Defendant:
Asphalt Restoration Technology Systems, Inc. and Connie Lorenz
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knight
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
OWENS et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES et al
as 4:2008cv00556
Defendant:
JOHN T CZERNIS, CHRISTOPHER KNIGHT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Plaintiff:
SHELESTER KEOTA OWENS, SHELESTER KEOTA OWENS, DANIELLE LATOYA RUSHING and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
