Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Pierce v. Waddington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv03160
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2013cv03108
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling
as 5:2009cv03183
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling
as 09-3144
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee: KAREN ROHLINGS
Pierce v. Rohling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv03027
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling et al
as 5:2007cv01405
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling and Phil Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling
as 5:2007cv03253
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv03083
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv03078
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling
as 6:2007cv00044
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?