Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Young v. Synsvoll et al
as 5:2019cv03087
Defendant:
J. E. Krueger, Department of Justice and Christopher Synsvoll
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hale v. Marques et al
as 1:2019cv00752
Defendant:
Rudy Marques, Christopher Synsvoll, D. Humphries and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew J.D. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Klein et al
as 1:2018cv01518
Petitioner:
Michael McGowan
Respondent:
P. Klein and Christopher Synsvoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Winter et al
as 5:2017cv03099
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Richard Winter, Kelee Dell, Christopher Synsvoll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hale v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Matt Hale
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Berkebile, Blake Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruce v. Dotson et al
as 1:2013cv02597
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Kathleen Dotson, Bureau of Prisons, James Pelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallett et al, vs. Holder, et al
as 1:2013cv02273
Petitioner:
Dawane Arthur Mallett and Hillard Lamarcus
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., David B. Berkebile, Shun Kuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Snider et al
as 1:2013cv01990
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Sean Snider, Armijo, J. Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery Akers v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 10-5336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant - Appellee:
Harrell Watts, Nation Appeals Coordinator, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Nalley, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Wiley, Warden, US Pentientiary-ADX, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Stine v. Davis, et al
as 10-1190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE DAVIS, CHRISTOPHER SYNSVOLL, MARK COLLINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
