Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Taylor v. RayzeBio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
RayzeBio, Inc., Richard Heyman, Tim Van Hauwermeiren and others
Taylor v. Avantax, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01222
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Avantax, Inc., Georganne Proctor, Mark Ernst and others
Taylor v. Thorne HealthTech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Thorne HealthTech, Inc., Paul Jacobson, Thomas McKenna and others
PETTY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
JASON SCOTT PETTY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DOWNINGTOWN POLICE DEPT. and OFFICER CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Summer Infant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Summer Infant, Inc., Robin Marino, Alan Mustacchi and others
Taylor v. CMC Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
CMC Materials, Inc., Richard S. Hill, Barbara A. Klein and others
Taylor v. NeoPhotonics Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
NeoPhotonics Corporation, Charles J. Abbe, Bandel L. Carano and others
Taylor v. Kraton Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01625
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Kraton Corporation, Shelley J. Bausch, Kevin M. Fogarty and others
Taylor v. IEC Electronics Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01283
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
IEC Electronics Corp., Keith M. Butler, Charles P. Hadeed and others
David Davison v. Douglas Sheaffer, et al
as 19-1967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID DAVISON, as an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHEAFFER, Individually and in his official capacity as Paorole Officer and/or Supervisor and VALERIE TAYLOR, As Administrator of the Estate of Christopher taylor, against whom relief is sought individually and for acts taken in his official capacity as Parole Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
