Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Russell v. Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
as 2:2013cv00160
Defendant:
Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
Plaintiff:
Cecil Ray Russell
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Jones v. Nueces County, Texas et al
as 2:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
Trey Jones
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas , Jim Kaelin , Nueces County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Johnson, Jr. et al
as 2:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tone Johnson, Jr., Geraldine M.B.S. Johnson, Nueces County Tax Assessor-Collector and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Jones v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2012mc00016
Plaintiff:
Trey Jones
Defendant:
Nueces County, Jim Kaelin, Nueces County Sheriff's Department and others
Salazar et al v. Nueces County, Texas et al
as 2:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Josie Salazar , Rose Rich and Annette Rodriguez
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas , Christus Spohn Health System Corporation, Jim Kaelin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Christus Spohn Health System Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Susanna Hinojosa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Christus Spohn Health System Corporation, Christus Spohn Health System Corporation d/b/a Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi - Memorial, Christus Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zamora et al v. Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
as 2:2009cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jesus Zamora and Priscilla Cantu
Defendant:
Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America, ex rel. Danny Lynn Smart -v- Christus Health, AKA Christus Health System, et al
as 2:2005cv00287
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel and Danny Lynn Smart
Defendant:
Christus Health and Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
