Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Coffman v. RayzeBio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
RayzeBio, Inc., Richard Heyman, Tim Van Hauwermeiren and others
Taylor v. RayzeBio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
RayzeBio, Inc., Richard Heyman, Tim Van Hauwermeiren and others
Stone v. Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Philip Stone
Defendant:
Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., J. Warren Huff, Christy J. Oliger and others
McGuiness v. Jennings et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Kramedas McGuiness, Christie R. Gross and My Campaign Group, LLC
Defendant:
Kathleen Jennings, Mark Denney, Frank Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Shavortis Powell, Emery Day, Jessica Knoke and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plumley v. Graybug Vision, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Graybug Vision, Inc., Christy Shaffer, Christina Ackermann and others
Berezin v. Croskrey et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samuel Berezin
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Richard Hendrix and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
Holloman v. Hudson et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Holloman
Defendant:
Commissioner Monroe Hudson, Bureau Chief Shane Troxler, Warden Robert May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ameigh et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Ginger Ameigh, Christi Baker, Robert Boepple and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Nona Greeley, Jennifer Adams, Michaella Adkins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
