Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chung Kao v. Robert Cobb, et al
as 18-55193
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHUNG CHUNG KAO, AKA Chung C. Kao
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT COBB, Correctional Counselor, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, K. BALAKIAN, Supervisor of Correctional Education Programs and others
Kao v. Soria et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00873
Plaintiff: Chung Kao
Defendant: R. Soria, B. Coffer, S. Arana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kao v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02908
Petitioner: Chung Kao
Respondent: Ronald Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chung Kao v. J. Delfin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-56496
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHUNG CHUNG KAO
Defendant - Appellee: J. DELFIN, Correctional Officer
Chung Kao v. Daniel Paramo
as 12-57259
Petitioner - Appellant: CHUNG KAO
Respondent - Appellee: DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Chung Kao v. Daniel Paramo
as 8:2012cv01971
Chung Kao v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01899
Defendant: M Acuna, R Ballesteros, C Bliss and others
Plaintiff: Chung Kao
Chung Kao v. Mike Knowles, et al
as 09-17565
Petitioner - Appellant: CHUNG KAO
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Chung Chung Kao v. M. Vela et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02841
Plaintiff: Chung Chung Kao
Defendant: M. Vela, M. Vela, D. Engler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kao v. Knowles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02739
Petitioner: Chung Kao
Respondent: Mike Knowles and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?