Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Bessinger v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al
as 4:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jay Bessinger
Defendant:
Cimarex Energy Co. and Coterra Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
U.S. Well Services, LLC v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
as 23-1692
Appellant:
U.S. WELL SERVICES, LLC
Appellee:
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. and CIMAREX ENERGY CO.
U.S. Well Services, LLC v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
as 23-1691
Appellant:
U.S. WELL SERVICES, LLC
Appellee:
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. and CIMAREX ENERGY CO.
U.S. Well Services, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.
as 23-1324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. WELL SERVICES, INC. and U.S. WELL SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
HALLIBURTON CO. and CIMAREX ENERGY CO.
Petitioner / Appellant:
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Appellee:
AFG HOLDINGS, INC.
Cory v. Coterra Energy Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Curtis Cory
Defendant:
Coterra Energy Inc and Cimarex Energy Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
US Well Services Inc et al v. Halliburton Company et al
as 5:2022mc00002
Plaintiff:
US Well Services Inc and US Well Services LLC
Defendant:
Halliburton Company and Cimarex Energy Co
Petitioner:
Kerr Machine Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al
as 1:2021cv07798
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Cimarex Energy Co., Thomas E. Jorden, Joseph R. Albi and others
CICCOTELLI v. CIMAREX ENERGY CO. et al
as 2:2021cv04113
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
CIMAREX ENERGY CO., THOMAS E JORDEN, PAUL N ECKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Parshall v. Cimarex Energy Company et al
as 1:2021cv01311
Plaintiff:
James Parshall
Defendant:
Cimarex Energy Company, Thomas E. Jorden, Paul N. Eckley and others
Sheridan v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al
as 1:2021cv01290
Plaintiff:
James Sheridan
Defendant:
Cimarex Energy Co., Thomas E. Jorden, Joseph R. Albi and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
