Cases 1 - 10 of 32
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Village of Oyster Bay Cove, et al
as 2:2022cv07807
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Village of Oyster Bay Cove, The Zoning Board of Appeals of The Village of Oyster Bay Cove and The Planning Board of The Village of Oyster Bay Cove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Muttontown et al
as 2:2022cv05524
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Incorporated Village of Muttontown, The Incorporated Village of Muttontown Board of Trustees, The Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lauren Calabrese, Aldo Calabrese, Tara Rice and others
Intervenor:
Russell McRory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay et al
as 2:2021cv03201
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay, Planning and Development Department of the Town of Oyster Bay, Town of Oyster Bay, New York and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crown Castle Towers 06-2 LLC et al v. The Town of Riverhead et al
as 2:2021cv00789
Defendant:
Town of Riverhead Town Board, Town of Riverhead Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Riverhead Planning Board and others
Plaintiff:
Sprint Spectrum L.P., Global Signal Acquisitions III LLC, STC-Five LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of Corinth et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
The Town of Corinth, The Town of Corinth Building Department and The Planning Board of the Town of Corinth
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Not Classified By Court:
Thomas J. Fucillo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Villella et al v. Logan et al
as 7:2020cv09905
Plaintiff:
Richard O. Villella, Courtney S. Tarpley, Michael I. Olshakoski and others
Defendant:
New Cingular Wireless PCD LLC d/b/a AT&T doing business as AT&T, Homeland Towers, LLC, Douglas W. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Town of Colonie
as 1:2020cv01388
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Town of Colonie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09126
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Eisenbach et al v. Village of Nelsonville et al
as 7:2020cv08566
Defendant:
Village of Nelsonville, Village of Nelsonville Zoning Board of Appeals, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a/ VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Plaintiff:
Joanne Eisenbach, Julien Davies, Catherine Polera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton et al
as 2:2020cv03555
Defendant:
The Town of East Hampton, The Town of East Hampton Building Department, The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Intervenor Defendant:
Peter Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
