Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Burgos v. Citibank, N.A
as 3:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
Susana Burgos
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A and Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rubio v. CitiBank, N.A. et al
as 0:2023cv60428
Plaintiff:
Kristina Rubio
Defendant:
CitiBank, N.A., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Jhoan Manuel Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bjorklund v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2022cv09085
Plaintiff:
Emily Bjorklund
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Citibank Consumer Disability Plan et al
as 3:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Smith
Defendant:
Citibank Consumer Disability Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
V. v. Aetna et al
as 2:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Alicia V.
Defendant:
Aetna, Citigroup Inc. doing business as Citibank and Citi Expatriate Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Perez v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Veronica Perez
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Perez v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2022at00176
Plaintiff:
Veronica Perez
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Geiman v. Mammoet USA North Inc.
as 1:2022cv10013
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Geiman
Defendant:
Mammoet USA North Inc.
Trustee:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rubio v. CitiBank, N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv23583
Plaintiff:
Kristina Rubio
Defendant:
CitiBank, N.A. and Rolando Santos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
IHC Health Services v. Citibank NMTC et al
as 2:2018cv00695
Plaintiff:
IHC Health Services
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and Citibank NMTC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
