Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bartlett v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2018cv07550
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., Marci Patera, CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roy M. Bartlett
Bartlett v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv07360
Plaintiff:
Roy M. Bartlett
Defendant:
Citibank N.A., CitiMortgage, Inc., Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Salma Agha-Khan, MD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03186
Defendant:
Kirk Edward Sherriff, Debbie Banducci, Barry L Goldner and others
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bartlett v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00712
Plaintiff:
Roy M. Bartlett
Defendant:
Citibank N.A. , CitiMortgage, Inc. , Northwest Trustee Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Citimortgage Inc v. Raymond D Flint et al
as 5:2015cv01663
Plaintiff:
Citimortgage Inc
Defendant:
Raymond D Flint, Does I through X, inclusive and Anthony Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
CitiMortgage Inc v. Rita Dinsmore et al
as 2:2015cv01204
Defendant:
Zita Shing Chua, Rita Dinsmore and Does
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage Inc
Cleveland et al v. American Mortgage Network, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01738
Plaintiff:
John Cleveland and Wylonn Cleveland
Defendant:
American Mortgage Network, Inc., First American Title Insurance, Alliance Title Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine Bacha v. The CIT Group Consumer Finance Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00875
Defendant:
Assured Lender Services Inc, Philipe Baltazar, Citimortgage Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bacha
CitiMortgage Inc et al v. Salvador A. Avalos et al
as 5:2011cv00280
Defendant:
Loyman Acosta Avalos, Salvador A. Avalos, Jr. and Does
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage Inc
CitiMortgage Inc v. Salvador A Avalos et al
as 5:2011cv00105
Defendant:
Loyman Acosta Avalos, Salvador A. Avalos, Jr. and Does
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
