Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rey Rabago v. Citibank South Dakota NA
as 5:2016cv00493
Defendant:
Citibank South Dakota NA
Plaintiff:
Rey Rabago
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johan Backlund v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA et al
as 5:2010cv01527
Plaintiff:
Johan Backlund
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA and Does
Citibank (South Dakota) NA v. Julie Ngo
as 5:2010cv01405
Counter Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA and Roes
Plaintiff:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA
Counter Claimant:
Julie Ngo
Defendant:
Julie Ngo
Sharon Haney v. Hunt and Henriques et al
as 8:2010cv00659
Counter Claimant:
Citibank South Dakota NA
Defendant:
Citibank South Dakota NA and Hunt and Henriques
Counter Defendant:
Sharon Haney and ROES 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Sharon Haney
David Kruse v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA et al
as 5:2008cv00675
Plaintiff:
David Kruse
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA, Experian Information Solutions Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. CitiBank N A
as 2:2007cv02220
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Defendant:
CitiBank N A, T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Counter Claimant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Special Master:
Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
