Cases 1 - 10 of 5,510
McKinley v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03465
Plaintiff:
Antonio McKinley
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Francisco Morado and Antonio Ocampo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindsey v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03483
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lindsey
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Robinson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Aileen Robinson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Yolanda Talley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BANKS v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03271
Plaintiff:
NICOLE BANKS
Defendant:
City of Chicago, ALEXANDRA GIAMPAPA, Thomas Spanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City Of Chicago v. Glock, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
City Of Chicago
Defendant:
Glock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Diggs v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Glenn Diggs
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Christopher Parker, Derrick Martin Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herbst v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Bradley Andrew Herbst
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ceballos v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Florencio Ceballos
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., Universal Protection Service, LLC, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
