Cases 41 - 50 of 321
Weible v. Kevin Provost et al
as 2:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Justin Weible
Defendant:
Kevin Provost, Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles, Nevada Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randall v. City of Las Vegas
as 2:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kenneth Randall
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas
Turner v. Martinez et al
as 2:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
John Turner
Defendant:
Officer Martinez LVMPD, Clark County Detention Center (CCDC), Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Hayes v. City of Las Vegas, et al
as 22-15617
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, CLARK COUNTY, MIRAGE HOTEL AND CASINO/MGM and others
Lamont Karriem v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 22-15600
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless, KELLY MAHILL, BRETT ZIMMERMAN, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity and others
McCarter v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Roy Rusch McCarter
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford, District Attorney Steven B. Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mulcahy v. City of Las Vegas
as 2:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Tim Mulcahy
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tran v. City of Las Vegas
as 2:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Hoang Kim Tran
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Las Vegas
as 2:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. City of Las Vegas Detention Center
as 2:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Darryl G Bowman
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
