Cases 81 - 90 of 159
Blackmon v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2014cv01076
Plaintiff:
Merilyn J. Blackmon
Defendant:
City of Akron and Unknown Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ohio Contractors Association v. City of Akron
as 5:2014cv00923
Plaintiff:
Ohio Contractors Association
Defendant:
City of Akron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2014cv00884
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio and Akron Energy Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3352
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taylor v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2014cv00440
Plaintiff:
Tony Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Akron and Ofc. Rkuznik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prade v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Douglas Prade
Defendant:
City of Akron, Mary Myers, Ed Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob Ragsdale v. Joseph Sidoti, et al
as 14-3009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACOB E. RAGSDALE
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH SIDOTI, Officer, City of Akron Police Department
Defendant:
CITY OF AKRON, OHIO and AKRON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Osburn Towing, Inc. v. City of Akron
as 5:2013cv02727
Defendant:
City of Akron
Plaintiff:
Osburn Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Akron State of Ohio v. Copeland
as 5:2013cv02631
Plaintiff:
City of Akron State of Ohio
Defendant:
Charles D Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brian Patterson, et al v. City of Akron, Ohio, et al
as 13-4321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN D. PATTERSON and DEREK J. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AKRON, OHIO, TIMOTHY GIVENS, Officer, City of Akron Police Department, in his individual and official capacities, MICHAEL RINN, Officer, in his individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
