Cases 1 - 10 of 13
City of Alexandria v. Reichl et al
as 1:2015cv02840
Plaintiff:
City of Alexandria
Defendant:
Frank A Reichl, General Chemical Corp, General Chemical Performance Products L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexandria v. Davidson
as 1:2014cv00723
Plaintiff:
City of Alexandria
Defendant:
H Craig Davidson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Alexandria v. Cleco Corporation, et al
as 13-30364
Plaintiff-Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CLECO CORPORATION
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. SHARP
City of Alexandria v. CLECO, Corp.
as 12-31101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY ENGLISH
Energy Management Services v. City of Alexandria
as 12-90070
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, L.L.C.
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
City of Alexandria v. Cleco Corporation, et al
as 12-30823
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGETT BROWN
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, JACQUES ROY and CHARLES E JOHNSON, JR.
Dual Construction, Inc. et al v. City of Alexandria
as 4:2012mc00381
Plaintiff:
Dual Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Alexandria
Third_party_defendant:
Merchants Bonding Co
Dual Construction, Inc v. City of Alexandria
as 4:2012mc00244
Plaintiff:
Dual Construction, Inc
Defendant:
City of Alexandria
Movant:
Merchants Bonding Company
Adams v. Alexandria
as 1:2011cv01484
Plaintiff:
Rachel Jennifer Adams
Defendant:
City of Alexandria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
City of Alexandria et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2010cv01849
Plaintiff:
City of Alexandria and City of Pineville
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency , U S Dept of Homeland Security , W Craig Fugate and others
Movant:
State of Louisiana , LA Dept of Transportation & Development , Louisiana Office of Coastal Protection and Restoration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.