Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Mills v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
Corry Mills
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Jeffrey Hahn and Aurora Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2010cv00707
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Aurora Police Dept and Christopher M Converse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner Jr.
as 1:2009cv04207
Plaintiff:
Michael Turner Jr. and Michael Turner Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Hahn, Bosson and City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. City Of Aurora et al
as 1:2009cv04144
Plaintiff:
Michael A Brooks and Michael A Brooks
Defendant:
City Of Aurora, P.O. Rashkow, P.O. Lill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Turner v. Rashkow et al
as 1:2009cv03383
Plaintiff:
Michael Turner, Sr., Michael Turner, Sr., Michael Turner, Sr. and others
Defendant:
P.O. Rashkow, P.O. Fabrie, J. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bronzino v. Sheldon et al
as 1:2009cv01048
Plaintiff:
Timothey Bronzino and Timothey Bronzino
Defendant:
D. Sheldon, B. Sheilds and City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flores v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2008cv07419
Plaintiff:
Kimberly H Flores
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Ricardo Galarza, S McCleary and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. Wiencek et al
as 1:2008cv05275
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Coleman and Dorothy Coleman
Defendant:
Jeffrey Wiencek, The City Of Aurora, Illinois and Provena Hospitals
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
