Cases 1 - 10 of 6,374
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Perez et al
as 1:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Perez
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
City Of Chicago v. Glock, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
City Of Chicago
Defendant:
Glock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dampeer v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02957
Plaintiff:
Monique Dampeer
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Erleen Banks, Daniel Johnson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Foster v. City of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2024cv02920
Plaintiff:
Cortez Foster
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police, Calvin Blunt, Jeffrey Hanssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon Jr. et al v. Lammert et al
as 1:2024cv02891
Plaintiff:
Temmy L. Dixon Jr., Cirsten M. Nunn and The City of Chicago
Defendant:
Timothy M. Lammert and Daniel P. Condreva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connor v. 606 W. Aldine Condo Assn. et al
as 1:2024cv02876
Plaintiff:
Latara Connor and Company, Inc. G&V Construction
Defendant:
City of Chicago 606 W. Aldine Condo Assn., Paving, LLC d/b/a Cardi Asphalt AGPD, Benesch Alfred Benesch & Co d/b/a and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
