Cases 21 - 30 of 455
Hampton v. Collins et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Hampton
Defendant:
Daniel A. Collins and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Herbert Pitts
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Charles
Defendant:
Ryan, Doherty, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gilmore
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Arresting Officer #1, Arresting Officer #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07181
Plaintiff:
Anthony Milner
Defendant:
City of Chicago, County of Cook and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv06607
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Jones
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Lopez, A.J. Poslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06264
Plaintiff:
Khari Walker
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Bradley R Scaduto and J M Toliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimmage v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05657
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimmage
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Mayes et al
as 1:2022cv04610
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley
Defendant:
L. Mayes, John Doe and City Of Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Nader et al
as 1:2022cv03510
Plaintiff:
Allen Joseph Gordon
Defendant:
Ismail Nader, Victor Guebara and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
