Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baez v. City of Commerce City, The et al
as 1:2017cv01221
Plaintiff:
Nicholas E. Baez
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, The, Troy Smith, Lowell Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leadholm v. City of Commerce City, The et al
as 1:2016cv02786
Plaintiff:
Carl Leadholm
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, The , Troy Smith, Christopher Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richter v. City of Commerce City, Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv01826
Plaintiff:
Derek M Richter
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, Colorado , Troy Smith , David Cubbage and others
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Green v. The City of Commerce City et al
as 1:2015cv01215
Plaintiff:
Scott Green
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, The, Troy (I) Smith, Brian McBroom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Branson v. Price et al
as 1:2013cv03090
Plaintiff:
Gary Branson
Defendant:
Robert Price, Arica Bores, Christopher Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perinn, v. City of Commerce City, State of Colorado, et al.,
as 1:2012cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Perinn
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, State of Colorado, Phillip (I) Baca, Phillip Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perinn v. City of Commerce City, Colorado et al
as 1:2011cv01892
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Perinn
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, Colorado , Phillip (I) Baca, Phillip Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordova, et al v. Aragon, et al
as 08-1222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACEY CORDOVA, MORGAN DOUTHIT and DIVINITY CORDOVA
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK ARAGON and CITY OF COMMERCE CITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
