Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Olivia Coley-Pearson v. Emily Martin, et al
as 23-13249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLIVIA COLEY-PEARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
EMILY MISTY MARTIN, JOE STEWART, ROBERT SPRINKLE and others
Jones v. City Of Douglas County Georgia
as 1:2021cv04443
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Jones
Defendant:
City Of Douglas County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loving v. City of Douglas et al
as 5:2021cv00024
Defendant:
John Derek Young, City of Douglas, Jeffrey Fyffe and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Loving, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Coley-Pearson v. Martin et al
as 5:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Emily Misty Martin, Joe Stewart, The City of Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Olivia Coley-Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Butler v. The City of Douglas, Georgia et al
as 5:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Tadesses Butler
Defendant:
The City of Douglas, Georgia , Kerry Moore , Joseph Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moore v. City of Douglas et al
as 5:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Theodore Moore
Defendant:
City of Douglas, Terrell Jacobs, Timothy White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vera Freeman v. City of Douglas, Georgia, et al
as 13-14610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DOUGLAS, GEORGIA, CITY COMMISSIONERS, Individually and Official and Private & Un-Private Capacities; Present and Past, MAYOR, Individually and Official and Private and Un-Official Capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
