Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Robert Zucker v. City of Farmington Hills, et al
as 16-1126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT S. ZUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS, POLICE CHIEF CHARLES NEBUS, SGT. WILLIAM MICHALUK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winterhawk v. City of Farmington et al
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Winterhawk
Defendant:
City of Farmington , Jon Lillywhite , Steve Hebbe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Marshall, et al v. City of Farmington Hills, et al
as 15-2380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MARSHALL and CHANDRA MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS, MICHAEL MEISTER, Officer, JARRETT, Officer and others
Thomas Noonan v. Oakland, County of, et al
as 15-2192
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS D. NOONAN
Defendant:
OAKLAND, COUNTY OF
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS and NICOLE TOMASOVICH-MORTON
Joseph Constant v. Bill Schuette, et al
as 15-1882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CONSTANT
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL SCHUETTE, Michigan State Attorney General, JESSICA COOPER, Oakland County Prosecutor, MICHAEL J. BOUCHARD, Oakland County Sheriff and others
Trujillo v. City of Farmington
as 1:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
Tye Trujillo
Defendant:
City of Farmington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chavez v. City of Farmington et al
as 1:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Michael Chavez
Defendant:
City of Farmington, Chris Blea, Dave Monfils and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Zucker v. City of Farmington Hills, et al
as 15-1202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT S. ZUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS, POLICE CHIEF CHARLES NEBUS, SGT. WILLIAM MICHALUK and others
Alix Kendall v. City of Albert Lea, et al
as 15-1288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alix Kendall
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Albert Lea, City of Annandale, Anoka County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
