Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dynamic Collision LLC v. City of Gadsden Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
Dynamic Collision LLC
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama and Gadsden Airport Authority
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ZLA Solutions ZLA Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hughley v. Bates et al
as 4:2020cv00515
Defendant:
Etowah County, City of Gadsden, Officer Tara Bates and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Demond Hughley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry Snow v. Thomas King, et al
as 18-10816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY SNOW
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS A. KING, Individually and Officially as Municipal Court Judge for the City of Gadsden, GARY TUCKER, Individually and Officially as Prosecutor for the City of Gadsden and GADSDEN, THE CITY OF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-17430
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McGruder v. City of Gadsden et al
as 4:2016cv01439
Plaintiff:
Lasheta R McGruder
Defendant:
City of Gadsden , Thomas Alexander King and Donald Gary Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-13389
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shabani v. City of Gadsden
as 4:2012cv00983
Plaintiff:
David Shabani
Defendant:
City of Gadsden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harbin v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2012cv00872
Plaintiff:
Roy Harbin
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edlin v. City of Gadsden, Alabama et al
as 4:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin Edlin
Defendant:
City of Gadsden, Alabama , City of Gadsden Police Department , Richard Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman et al v. City of Gadsden, Alabama
as 2:2009cv02464
Plaintiff:
John Bowman, Chris Crisler, Steve Daniel and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
