Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Grange Mutual Casualty Company v. Indian Summer Carpet Mills Inc et al
as 4:2017cv01263
Plaintiff:
Grange Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Indian Summer Carpet Mills Inc, Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Gadsden, The and Water Works and Sewer Board of The Town of Centre, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-17430
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McGruder v. City of Gadsden et al
as 4:2016cv01439
Plaintiff:
Lasheta R McGruder
Defendant:
City of Gadsden , Thomas Alexander King and Donald Gary Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-13389
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joe Taylor, et al v. City of Gadsden, et al
as 13-13885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE TAYLOR, JEFF MAYBEN, LECIL HARRELSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GADSDEN, AL, an Alabama Municipal corporation and SHERMAN GUYTON, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Gadsden
Shabani v. City of Gadsden
as 4:2012cv00983
Plaintiff:
David Shabani
Defendant:
City of Gadsden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harbin v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2012cv00872
Plaintiff:
Roy Harbin
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edlin v. City of Gadsden, Alabama et al
as 4:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin Edlin
Defendant:
City of Gadsden, Alabama , City of Gadsden Police Department , Richard Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman et al v. City of Gadsden, Alabama
as 2:2009cv02464
Plaintiff:
John Bowman, Chris Crisler, Steve Daniel and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Barnett v. City of Gadsden, Alabama et al
as 4:2008cv01567
Plaintiff:
George Barnett
Defendant:
City of Gadsden, Alabama and Jake Mayo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
