Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Roberto Rodriguez v. City of Hemet et al
as 2:2011cv03518
Defendant:
City of Hemet, Does and Hemet Police Department
Plaintiff:
Roberto Rodriguez
Howard Tounget v. City of Hemet
as 11-55429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD TOUNGET
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HEMET, a Public entity
Jane Doe v. Richard Allen Casey et al
as 5:2010cv01339
Defendant:
Richard Allen Casey, City of Hemet, California and Does
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Rosemary Morillo et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2010cv03421
Defendant:
Michael Arellano, Michael Arellano, Joshua Cadenhead and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Morillo and Rosemary Morillo
Michael Saenz v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2010cv00695
Defendant:
Michael Arrellano, Michael Arrellano, Joshua Cadenhead and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Saenz
Shawn Mahler v. City of Hemet et al
as 5:2009cv01274
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mahler
Defendant:
City of Hemet, City of Hemet and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rodney Jackson et al v. City of Hemet et al
as 2:2008cv06269
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jackson, Jr., Rodney Jackson, Jr., Rodney Jackson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Hemet, Hemet Police Department, Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Albert Morrow v. Arturo Lopez Navarro et al
as 5:2008cv00739
Plaintiff:
Ronald Albert Morrow
Defendant:
Arturo Lopez Navarro, City of Hemet and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Howard Tounget v. City of Hemet et al
as 5:2008cv00464
Plaintiff:
Howard Tounget
Defendant:
City of Hemet, City of Hemet, Hemet City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
