Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Trull v. Hitchcock et al
as 2:2023at00593
Plaintiff:
Marcus Joshua Trull
Defendant:
Michael Hitchcock and City of Lodi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trull v. City of Lodi et al
as 2:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Marcus Joshua Trull, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Lodi and Michael Hitchcock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khan et al v. City of Lodi, CA et al
as 2:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Shakir Khan, Umer Hayat, Adnan Bilal and others
Defendant:
City of Lodi, California, Mikey Hothi, The City Council of the City of Lodi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Khan v. City of Lodi et al
as 2:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Muddsar Khan
Defendant:
City of Lodi, Michael Hitchcock, N. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Best Supplement Guide, LLC et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv00965
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Joanne Mounce, Sonia Y. Angell and others
Plaintiff:
Best Supplement Guide, LLC and Sean Covell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cross Culture Christian Center et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv00832
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Marcia Cunningham, City of Lodi and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Duncan, Cross Culture Christian Center, Pastor Jim Franklin and others
Amicus Curiae:
Americans United For Separation of Church and State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Lodi, California et al
as 2:2018cv01964
Defendant:
San Joaquin County, Pacific Tow, City of Lodi, California and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. City of Lodi
as 2:2017cv02169
Plaintiff:
Muddsar Khan
Defendant:
City of Lodi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paternostro v. City of Lodi
as 2:2017at01018
Plaintiff:
Marika Paternostro
Defendant:
City of Lodi
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Paternostro v. City of Lodi
as 2:2017cv02062
Plaintiff:
Marika Paternostro
Defendant:
City of Lodi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
